Charles Broom vs Javier Barranco Cosano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 04:50 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs J. Barranco Cosano

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Cosano
They have played 3 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Javier Barranco Cosano winning 1. The last match between Charles Broom and Javier Barranco Cosano was at the Hersonissos 6 Challenger, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broom | 1 |
| Cosano | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hersonissos 6 Challenger(10-14-25)
C. Broom vs J. B. Cosano H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $39,970 | Career Prize Money | $107,105 |
| 62.17% (263-160) | Career Total W/L | 60.38% (378-248) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 17 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Broom vs J. B. Cosano Match Preview:
- Javier Barranco Cosano wins 40.68% of points on his second serve in recent form, while Charles Broom has a slightly better rate at 42.22%. Could this edge affect the match outcome?
- Cosano outperforms Broom in returning second serves, winning 45.24% of points, just above Broom's 44.89%.
- Both players show similar capabilities in returning first serves, with Cosano at 28.14% and Broom at 27.80%.
- When it comes to saving breakpoints, Charles Broom leads with 52.76%, compared to Cosano's 50.63%, possibly giving him an edge under pressure.
- Over the past year, Broom also boasts superior match performance, with a win rate of 62.90% (W/L 39/23) versus Cosano's 56.36% (W/L 31/24).
- Both players have their best win rate on Clay, at 61%. How might surface preference influence the match?
- While Cosano mostly competes in Challengers, Broom's predominant platform has been in Futures, boasting a higher win rate there (75.00%).
- Average opponent rank slightly favors Broom (351.26) over Cosano (379.69) in quality of competition faced over the past year.
- In deciding sets, Broom's 44% win rate surpasses Cosano's 33%, indicating a potential advantage in tight scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the stats, Charles Broom appears to have slight advantages in key areas, including second serve strength and breakpoint resilience. These factors could be significant in determining the match outcome.
Though both players have equal success on clay courts, Broom's recent superior performance in terms of win rate and ability to prevail in deciding sets positions him as the likely favorite.
Therefore, considering these factors, Charles Broom is the most probable winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Charles Broom vs Javier Barranco Cosano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs J. B. Cosano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:4:13 | Average Match Time | 2:4:13 |
| 57% (48/84) | 1st Serve % | 65% (49/75) |
| 79% (38/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (38/49) |
| 61% (22/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (10/26) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 36% (27/75) | Return Points Win % | 29% (24/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
J. B. Cosano Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | ||

C. Broom vs J. B. Cosano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.17% (263/160) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.38% (378/248) |
| 59.58% (591/401) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.39% (839/598) |
| 54.00% (5054/4306) | Games Win/Loss | 53.41% (7112/6205) |
| 65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.70% (29/25) |
| 66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.52% (339/212) |
| 56.64% (64/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1782 | Aces Total | 1030 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1040 | Total Double Faults | 1565 |
| 1:28:4 | Average Match Time | 1:34:22 |
| 384.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.01 |
| 62% (15289/24616) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25028/38436) |
| 70% (10707/15289) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (16024/25028) |
| 50% (4709/9326) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6482/13408) |
| 41% (1115/2698) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2071/4534) |
| 41% (10721/26149) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17034/39033) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 45.76% (54/64) | Challenger W/L | 47.26% (112/125) |
| 69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 69.21% (263/117) |
| 62% (261/420) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (366/609) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 52% (71/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (81/148) |
| 54% (79/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (102/194) |
| 87% (250/218) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (368/321) |
| 13% (250/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (368/47) |
| 26% (173/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (258/56) |